- NDA's economic, governance strategy will be different: Advani
- Delhi to facilitate sightless voters
- Court extends custody of Utsav Bhasin in BMW hit-and-run case
- Over 1,500 polling booths in Delhi sensitive, hypersensitive
- Congress president more important than PM: Advani
- President goes on 10-day tour of Indonesia, Vietnam next week
Mid-Day journalists behind the bars for contempt of court
Sep 22: On Friday Delhi High Court sentenced four months jail term to two journalists, one publisher and one cartoonist of Mid-Day daily for Court found them guilty of contempt of court on September 11 and had fixed the date for announcement of quantum of the punishment till September 21.
-
E-mail Article
Printer Friendly
Text-Size

In May 19 th edition of Mid-Day daily, a report appeared which said that Justice YK Sabharwal, in the capacity of CJI passed judgements on the sealing of commercial property in the residential areas which benefited his sons who are partners in Mall developers.
The court started the proceedings suo moto
Court held that an accusation against the former CJI amounts to the contempt of court as it tears the image of judiciary as a whole.
As counsel of the journalists, former law minister, MR. Shanti Bhushan rejected the offer for argument on the quantum of the punishment and maintained that journalists presented the truth and truth is and explicit defence under the contempt of Courts Act”.
This is to be known that after the amendment was effected to the Contempt of Court Act 1971 in 2006 truth is recognized as a valid defence in any case of contempt of Court.
A bench comprising Justice Sodhi and Justice B N Chaturvadi said, “As they neither seek an apology nor do they opt to argue and reiterate their stand which has tarnished the image of the highest court, a four month imprisonment would serve the ends of justice”.
The Bench said that the publications actually attacked the very institution which is nothing short of contempt. The bench also rejected the argument that after retirement the judge ceased to be a part of the judicial system and writing against him does not tantamount to the contempt of court and held that the nature of the disclosures though quoting the former CJI hurts the image of the Highest Court of the land.
All four of the convicted Vitusha Oberoi, MK Tayal, S K Akhtar and Irfan Khan have been released on bail on a personal bond of Rs.10,000.
Journalists demonstrated in the premises of the court protesting the proceeding against them. The Editor’s Guild of India is scheduled to meet next month to discuss the issue of the amendment of the contempt of court law.
Several papers have come in the defence of the journalists and held the proceedings by the court as ‘contempt for pen’ and ‘contempt for democracy’.
Bollywood - Depicting reality.
UK keeps cool over the capture of its sailors, issue to be resolved peacefully.
Pro-Pak HM praises Pro-India NC.
It is election time; everybody who is somebody is earning and enjoying.
Stringent traffic rules in the capital.



