Washington, April 18 (IANS) Sixty percent of Wikipedia articles about companies contain factual errors, according to a new research, which warned people not to rely on the website for accurate and balanced information.
"It does not surprise me that so many Wikipedia entries contain factual errors," said Marcia W. DiStaso, assistant professor of public relations at Penn State University, who conducted the research.
"A high amount of factual errors doesn't work for anyone, especially the public, which relies on Wikipedia for accurate, balanced information," says DiStaso.
DiStaso surveyed 1,284 professionals from Public Relations Society of America, the International Association of Business Communicators, the Word of Mouth Marketing Association, the Institute for Public Relations and the National Investor Relations Institute to assess their working relationship with Wikipedia, the Public Relations Journal reports.
Results of the survey indicate a gap exists between public relations professionals and Wikipedia concerning the proper protocol for editing entries, according to a Penn statement.
When respondents attempted to engage editors through Wikipedia's "Talk" pages to request corrections of facts in entries, 40 percent said it took "days" to receive a response, 12 percent indicated "weeks," while 24 percent never received any type of response.
According to Wikipedia, its standard response time to requests for corrections is between two and five days.
Only 35 percent of respondents were able to engage with Wikipedia, either by using its "Talk" pages to converse with editors or through direct editing of a client's entry.
Respondents indicated this figure is low partly because some fear media backlash over making edits to clients' entries. Respondents also expressed a certain level of uncertainty regarding how to properly edit Wikipedia entries.
Of those who were familiar with the process of editing Wikipedia entries, 23 percent said making changes was "near impossible". Twenty-nine percent said their interactions with Wikipedia editors were "never productive".
"What is surprising, however, is that 25 percent of survey respondents indicated they are not familiar with the Wikipedia articles for their company or clients. At some point most, if not all, companies will determine they need to change something in their Wikipedia entries," said DiStaso.
Without clear, consistent rules from Wikipedia regarding how factual corrections can be made, this will be a very difficult learning process for public relations professionals.
Read More: Union Public Service Commissio | Ingram Institute Edbo | Agriculture Institute | Public Service Commission | Rajkot Marketing Yard | Public Office | Haffkin Institute Po | Hyderabad Public School | Science Institute Lsg So | Karnata Health Institute | Indian Institute Of Technology | Central Institute Of Technolog | Ponneri Public Office | Chengalpattu Public Offices | Cuddalore Public Offices | Papanasam Public Office | Ramnanathapuram Public Offices | Periyakulam Public Office | Health Institute Po | Assam Engg. Institute