- More indigenous components in second moon mission: ISRO
- Political parties protest against recent Assam violence
- Security beefed-up in Mumbai ahead of 26/11 anniversary
- Sonia Gandhi assures support to wives of Hemant Karkare, Vijay Salaskar
- Indian sub-continent is prone to nuclear war: Army Chief
- Chhattisgarh man, a snake venom junkie
Politics of communalism, egoism & boasting buried
People of India have given their mandate for 15th general elections. Many views are being expressed about this mandate. Some analysts feel that this mandate is against the narrow mindedness of regional parties and in favour of national parties. Some feel that this mandate is for a stable Union government. But in spite of all this, all political analysts have this collective view that through this mandate the people of India have buried the communal, egoistic & boastful politics of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
-
E-mail Article
Printer Friendly
Text-Size

In the last general elections where the BJP was having 138 seats, the Congress had 145 Members of Parliament. This time the tally of the BJP is reduced to 116 while the Congress has increased its tally to 205. That is, the gain of 60 seats for the Congress and loss of 22 seats for the BJP.
BJP used different propagandas to win the 15th general elections. It continuously attacked the Congress led-UPA government in aggressive manner. Think tanks of the BJP made war like strategies. Accordingly, Lal Krishna Advani was declared as the ‘Prime Minister in Waiting’ of the BJP. Besides, the slogan ‘Strong Leader, Decisive Government’ was publicised. Along with this slogan, Advani started targeting the Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh by calling him a ‘weak Prime Minister’.
This compelled the Prime Minister, in the last hours of election campaign, to remind the people of the country regarding the Kandahar plane hijack and terrorist attack on Parliament during the regime of Advani as the home minister of India.
Another leader to lead the campaign of the party was the Chief Minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi. During the whole election campaign, Modi seemed to be drowned in the ego of ‘ruling Gujarat’. While Advani was given the tag of ‘Loh Purush’(Iron Man) by the BJP people, Modi too was given titles of Vikaas Purush (Man of Development), Hindu hriday samrat, second Chanakya and chhote Sardar Patel etc.
In this very ego, Modi addressed about 200 public meetings, out of which the party managed to win only 18 seats outside Gujarat. Even in Gujarat, the party’s performance was lower than expected. For the purpose of polishing the persona of Modi and more polarization of the Hindu votes, a minor row was caused by projecting Modi as the prime ministerial candidate next to Advani. But all this rhetoric failed to impress the Indian voters.
Modi, the star campaigner of the BJP, was too made the party in charge of Maharashtra and Goa. In both these states, the party performed worse than before. In Haryana and Punjab, the party lost all those seats where Modi campaigned. In contrast, in Bihar, where Modi was ‘prohibited’ to enter by the ally of the BJP, the party along with the Janata Dal (United), performed better.
Indeed the people have completely rejected the egoistic, rhetorical and venomous communal speeches of Narendra Modi. Modi may praise himself by watching his speeches and styles on TV screen, but the voter of India was watching all this with his third Eye, the level of speeches by the future ‘Prime Minister in Waiting’.
It is to be noted that during the general elections of 2004, Narendra Modi said vis-à-vis Rahul Gandhi that nobody would like to employ him as a driver. Regarding Sonia Gandhi, this ‘Vikaas Purush’ said that nobody would give her a room on rent. During current elections, this ‘modern Chanakya’ of the BJP once again spewed shoddy and cheap words. One day he called the Congress-an old woman, the other day- a doll. He compared the members of the Gandhi family with the fish of aquarium and himself as a leader capable to face the ‘Tsunami’.
While Modi tried to communalise the issue of terrorism and Afzal Guru, in the NDA rally in Ludhiana he sympathized with the killer terrorists of General Vaid. What Modi wanted to make out of this churning, didn’t get either in Ludhiana, Delhi, Punjab or Haryana. Moreover, the awakened people of the country understood the double standards of Narendra Modi on terrorism.
During the 26/11 terror attacks on Mumbai while the whole nation was feeling scared, at the same time Modi visited the Taj Hotel and tried to make political mileage of it. During the whole election campaign, neither Modi had any model for the development of the country, nor did he talk about it. He was so lost in his special clothing and new aggressive style that he couldn’t see anything beyond his firebrand speeches, negative thoughts, and verbal attacks on opposition in general and Nehru-Gandhi family in particular. Sometimes he was seen enraged by Media and sometimes he decided to be quiet and drink water, instead of replying the relevant questions of media. The whole nation watched this.
In contrast to this, Rahul Gandhi tried to make people dream of ‘Young India’. He put the agenda of development before the country.He talked about national integration. He resolved to protect the secular values of the Congress party. He stressed on the need of communal harmony in the country. Both Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi gave the message that for all round development of the nation, the biggest prerequisite is unity and communal and social harmony.
India can never progress in a tensed atmosphere. Indian voters felt this right and good. The acceptability of Rahul Gandhi can be understood from the fact that he campaigned in 106 constituencies of the country, out of which the party won 65 seats. Voters too saw and recognised the honesty and hard work of Dr. Manmohan Singh.
We have to admit that the majority of voters of India, which we think are illiterate, uneducated and backward, are now politically much aware and day to day is getting more aware. In this age of politics of uncertainty and communalism, giving stable and secular government is the biggest evidence of the awareness of Indian voters.
[Author Tanveer Jafri is a columnist based in India.He is related with hundreds of most popular daily news papers/portals in India and abroad. Jafri almost writes in the field of communal harmony, world peace, anti communalism, anti terrorism, national integration, national & international politics etc. Tanveer Jafri is also a member of Haryana Sahitya Academy & Haryana Urdu Academy (state govt. bodies in India). Thousands articles of the author have been published in different newspapers, websites & newsportals throughout the world. He can be contacted at:
First Woman president likely for India, Pratibha Patil is UPA-Left candidate.
Haneef likely to return India, charges dropped against him.
India, Japan, S. Korea and Malaysia enter Asia Cup Semifinals.
India, Brazil, South Africa vow to push world trade deal.
India, China and Russia against sanction on Myanmar.
| 1. | Its not surprising to see an anti-BJP article from a muslim writer. When congress does business with anti-India parties like MIM and IUML it is called secular. These are the same parties that are more loyal to Islam than our nation. How can one explain the win of cricketer Mohd Azharuddin who was a known match fixer that too from a place he doesn't belong to ? On what basis did moradabad voters elect him knowing well that he was ousted from International cricket for betraying his country ? In India the truth is to win elections the parties need to play the caste/religion cards right.The avg Indian has no idea about national issues like article 370, UCC...All he is bothered about which party speaks for his caste and religion...If BJP is communal then congress is more communal for taking the support of ISI supported terrorist MP Mr Shahbuddin after the 2004 elections. | Vinay 2009-05-18 |



