- Stolen missiles from Gaddafi targets Britain chopper pilots
- Argentina accuses UK of treating Falkands as 'last refuge of declining empire'
- Imran Khan accuses Gilani of putting system at risk to save corrupt Zardari
- New survey shows Santorum trails Obama by just four percent in White House race
- Egypt's generals reject calls for civilian cabinet
- Burma's 'Saffron Revolution' leader detained within weeks of release
Nuke deal in national interest: Kalam
New Delhi, July 3 (ANI): Former President and scientist A.P.J. Abdul Kalam on Thursday told the Samajwadi Party chief Mulayam Singh Yadav that the Indo-US civil nuclear deal was beneficial for the country and they should keep national interest above politics while firming up their stand on the issue.
Mulayam Singh Yadav and General Secretary Amar Singh called on former president's residence after a meeting of United National Progressive Alliance (UNPA) where it was decided to seek the opinion of experts of eminent scientists on the issue before future course of action could be chalked out."Kalam told us the nuclear deal is in the interest of the nation and without it there is no politics. Kalam has spoken to us, now we will decide in the interest of the nation," said Yadav.
In an effort to ensure that SP is brought to its fold, the government on Wednesday gave special briefing to its leaders Amar Singh and Ram Gopal Yadav on the nuclear deal to address their concerns over the agreement.
Singh later said the arguments given by National Security Adviser M K Narayanan to them would be put before the UNPA meeting so that these could be discussed. (ANI)
Kalam backs Indo-US Nuke deal.
Nuke-trade denied India cannot consider cooperation with Egypt: Mukherjee.
Nuke deal in national interest: Kalam.
"Peshawar Talibanisation threatens long-term stability of Nuke-armed Pak".
Nuke energy for peaceful use only if safeguards are in place: G-8 leaders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments:
bala
July 3, 2008 at 12:00 AM








WHY CONGRESS LED GOVT HESITATE TO DISCUSS THIS ISSUE IN THE PARLIAMANT? WHY DONT DISCLOSE THE FACTS BEHIND THIS ISSUE AND DISCUSS THIS WITH OUR INDIAN SCIENTISTS? WHY WE PAY FOR THE TECHNOLOGY THAT HAS BEEN USED VERY LONG BACK IN UNITED STATES AND STOPPEDUSING THIS TECHNOLOGY LONG BACK? IF THE GOVT FEELS THAT IT IS A HISTORICAL IMPORTANT DEAL WHY HESITATE TO DISCLOSE THE "HIDE" ACT INVOLVED IN THIS DEAL? COMMON MAN LIKE ME HAVE THESE QUESTIONS THEN WHY EDUCATIONISTS AND SCIENTISTS ACCEPT IT WITHOUT QUESTIONING. IF IT IS IN NATIONAL INTEREST LIKE KALAM FEELS WHY DON'T U DISCLOSE EVERYTHING?